Skip to content
New: free AI crawler checker. See if ChatGPT and Claude can read your site. Check now
Get a free audit
Get a free audit Contact us +91 96211 05242

Popular

Web and software development · updated 23 Oct 2026

Web and software development statistics 2026

Developer jobs and pay, tool use, and how fast websites load, from official data and large surveys.

20stats8sources100%linked to the source
Web and software development · the headline stat
65.9%

of developers use AI coding assistants or coding agents at work (Stack Overflow 2026 survey)

SurveyChecked at sourceAll sizesGlobal
GroupUse AI coding assistants or agents
1 to 5 years57.8%
6 to 15 years72.7%
16+ years69.6%
All respondents65.9%
Source: Stack Overflow, Stack Overflow Developer Survey Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2026, question AISelect (multi-select). Work experience groups are the survey's own.digitaltreed.com/statistics

Source: Stack Overflow, Stack Overflow Developer Survey, Jun to Aug 2026

Open this stat

20 stats
Web and software development
65.9%

of developers use AI coding assistants or coding agents at work (Stack Overflow 2026 survey)

SurveyStack Overflow, Jun to Aug 2026

Chart studio

Web and software development in one chart

Switch the chart type and the style; sort it, download it or embed it. Hover a bar for the exact value.

Developers using AI coding assistants or agents, by experience

GroupUse AI coding assistants or agents
1 to 5 years57.8%
6 to 15 years72.7%
16+ years69.6%
All respondents65.9%
Source: Stack Overflow, Stack Overflow Developer Survey Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2026, question AISelect (multi-select). Work experience groups are the survey's own.digitaltreed.com/statistics

What this chart tells you

Ask Diboo to explain it
  1. Two in three respondents (65.9%) use AI coding assistants or agents at work.
  2. Developers with 6 to 15 years of experience use them most: 72.7%.
  3. 16+ years: 69.6%.

Same data, any style

More views of the Web and software development data

Coding agents and assistants developers used in the past year

GroupShare of agent users
Claude Code65.5%
GitHub Copilot58.7%
OpenAI Codex29.5%
Cursor25.5%
Google Antigravity16%
Gemini Code Assist14.6%
Source: Stack Overflow, Stack Overflow Developer Survey Base: 12,255 respondents who used any coding agent or assistant. Multi-select.digitaltreed.com/statistics

US median yearly pay, May 2025

GroupMedian pay
Software developers135980$
Web and digital interface designers104000$
Software QA analysts and testers104300$
Web developers92650$
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook (OEWS wages).digitaltreed.com/statistics

Websites with good Core Web Vitals, 2021 to 2025

GroupMobileDesktop
202132%41%
202231%44%
202336%48%
Method change: INP replaced FID (Mar 2024)
202444%55%
202548%56%
Source: HTTP Archive, Web Almanac (SEO chapter) INP replaced FID as the responsiveness metric on 12 March 2024, so 2024-2025 use a stricter test than earlier years.digitaltreed.com/statistics

Every stat

All Web and software development stats

Each card links to its own page with the source, a ready citation and the data.

SurveyAll sizesGlobal
65.9%

of developers use AI coding assistants or coding agents at work (Stack Overflow 2026 survey)

Sample: 30,903 valid responses from 169 countries, fielded 23 Jun to 5 Aug 2026; self-selected online survey. Each question has its own n.

SurveyAll sizesGlobal
57.8%

of developers with 1 to 5 years of work experience use AI coding assistants or agents, the lowest of any experience group

Sample: n = 4,094 respondents with 1 to 5 years of work experience.

SurveyAll sizesGlobal
73%

of developers who use AI coding assistants or agents use them every day

Sample: 30,903 valid responses from 169 countries, fielded 23 Jun to 5 Aug 2026; self-selected online survey. Each question has its own n.

SurveyAll sizesGlobal
65.5%

of developers who used a coding agent or assistant in the past year used Claude Code; 58.7% used GitHub Copilot

Sample: 30,903 valid responses from 169 countries, fielded 23 Jun to 5 Aug 2026; self-selected online survey. Each question has its own n.

SurveyAll sizesGlobal
48%

of developers say they trust AI output when they can easily verify it; 6.6% trust it for many tasks including important work decisions

Sample: 30,903 valid responses from 169 countries, fielded 23 Jun to 5 Aug 2026; self-selected online survey. Each question has its own n.

SurveyAll sizesGlobal
84%

of developers used or planned to use AI tools in their development process in 2025, up from 76% in 2024

Sample: 49,000+ responses from 177 countries; self-selected online survey.

SurveyAll sizesGlobal
46%

of developers distrusted the accuracy of AI tools in 2025, more than the 33% who trusted it

Sample: 49,000+ responses from 177 countries; self-selected online survey.

StudyAll sizesGlobal
55.8%

faster: freelance developers with GitHub Copilot finished one JavaScript server task in 71 minutes vs 161 without it (2022 test)

Sample: 95 professional freelance developers recruited on Upwork (45 with Copilot, 50 without); the paper says thirty-five from both groups completed the task and survey. Most aged 25-34, mainly from India and Pakistan.

StudyAll sizesGlobal
19%

longer: experienced open-source developers took 19% more time on tasks when allowed AI tools (early-2025 test; METR now calls it out of date)

Sample: 16 experienced developers from large open-source repositories, 246 real issues randomly assigned to AI allowed or not.

Vendor dataAll sizesGlobal
56%

average security pass rate of AI-written code across more than 100 models tested since 2023, so about 4 in 10 tasks fail (vendor test)

ResearchAll sizesGlobal
48%

of mobile websites had good Core Web Vitals in 2025, against 56% on desktop

Sample: Chrome UX Report real-user data for millions of websites (origins), mobile and desktop.

ResearchAll sizesGlobal
62%

of mobile pages had good loading speed (Largest Contentful Paint) in June 2025, the weakest of the three Core Web Vitals

Sample: Chrome UX Report real-user data for millions of websites (origins), mobile and desktop.

ResearchAll sizesGlobal
0.3%

of all websites now run on Lovable, an AI app builder used for vibe coding, slightly more than Astro or GitHub Pages (0.2% each)

Vendor dataAll sizesGlobal
180M+

developers on GitHub in 2025, after more than 36 million joined in a year (over one per second)

GitHub, Octoverse, Sep 2024 to Aug 2025
Vendor dataAll sizesGlobal
80%

of new developers on GitHub use Copilot in their first week; TypeScript became GitHub's most used language in Aug 2025

GitHub, Octoverse, Sep 2024 to Aug 2025

Reconciled

Same question, different answers

The different numbers you see quoted are often all real: they come from different panels, years and questions. Here they are side by side.

Does AI make developers faster? Why studies disagree

NumberWhenWho measuredWhy it differs
55.8% faster2022 test, published 2023GitHub Copilot experiment (arXiv 2302.06590)95 Upwork freelancers, one new JavaScript task, early Copilot.
19% slowerFeb to Jun 2025METR randomized trial16 experienced developers on their own large repositories, early-2025 tools; METR now calls it out of date.
-18% for returning developersAug 2025 to early 2026METR update, Feb 2026Late-2025 tools; METR reads it as some evidence of speed-up but says selection effects make it weak evidence.
73% daily useJun to Aug 2026Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2026Self-reported use, not measured speed.

Do developers trust AI? 2025 vs 2026 Stack Overflow numbers

NumberWhenWho measuredWhy it differs
33% trust, 46% distrust2025Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025Five-point trust scale on AI accuracy.
48% trust when easy to verify; 6.6% for important decisions2026Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2026New answer options about when people trust AI; not comparable as a trend.

Stat check

Numbers about Web and software development you should stop quoting

Famous stats with no real source, or quoted wrong, and where they came from.

Misquoted

GitHub Copilot makes developers 55% more productive

A 2022 controlled test (arXiv 2302.06590): 95 Upwork freelancers recruited, one task (an HTTP server in JavaScript); the Copilot group finished 55.8% faster (95% CI 21% to 89%). It measured one task's speed, not overall productivity. Where it came from

Quote this instead: 55.8%
Outdated

AI makes experienced developers 19% slower

METR's early-2025 trial of 16 open-source developers. METR now labels it out of date; its February 2026 update points to a likely speed-up but says the new data is unreliable because developers refused to work without AI. Where it came from

Quote this instead: 19%
Misquoted

Only 29% of developers trust AI tools

Repeated by roundup sites for the 2025 Stack Overflow survey. The survey page says 33% trust AI accuracy and 46% distrust it; in 2026 the question changed and 48% trust AI output when they can easily verify it. Where it came from

Quote this instead: 48%
Outdated

53% of mobile visitors leave a site that takes longer than 3 seconds to load

Google/DoubleClick 'The Need for Mobile Speed' (2016). The Think with Google page that hosted it now redirects elsewhere; use current Core Web Vitals data instead. Where it came from

Quote this instead: 48%

Get the numbers when they change

One email a day at most, only when a source publishes new data. No other mail.

Every number on this page was checked at its original source. Free to cite with a link to the stat page.